Primary navigation:

QFINANCE Quick Links
QFINANCE Topics
QFINANCE Reference
Add the QFINANCE search widget to your website

Home > Corporate Governance Best Practice > Reinvesting in the Company versus Rewarding Investors with Distributions

Corporate Governance Best Practice

Reinvesting in the Company versus Rewarding Investors with Distributions

by Ruth Bender

Executive Summary

  • Dividend payouts will always depend on having sufficient retained profits and cash.

  • Companies should invest in growth if doing so will generate a return above the cost of capital, as this will increase stockholder value. If there are no value-enhancing investments, surplus cash should be returned to stockholders.

  • Stockholder expectations will drive dividend policy, and changes to that policy should be signaled clearly to investors.

Introduction

Stockholders gain value from their investments in two ways—either by receiving dividends or by realizing a capital gain. Dividend policy is determined directly by a company’s board, which has to decide whether to make a payout or to reinvest.

Although many factors underlie the dividend decision, there is one basic rule: If there are investment opportunities where the expected return exceeds the company’s cost of capital, value will be created by making the investment and it should be done. If there are insufficient value-creating opportunities, the surplus cash should be distributed to stockholders.

Therefore, the question to ask when considering reinvestment versus distribution to investors should be: Will this create stockholder value?

Dividend Policy

Companies that pay dividends try to increase the absolute level of dividend each year in order to meet investor expectations.

Two numbers are relevant to understanding dividend policy: The level of the annual dividend (which may in practice be paid in quarterly or semi-annual installments), and the dividend payout ratio (the dividend for the year as a percentage of after-tax income). Stockholders are concerned with the absolute level of dividend they receive, but will also have an eye on the dividend payout ratio.

If the payout ratio is kept constant, then, as profits grow, the absolute level of dividend will become progressively larger. However, volatility in profits would mean volatility in payouts, and this is unsatisfactory to investors. Accordingly, most companies have a more flexible attitude to the payout ratio, aiming to smooth the distribution, increasing dividends annually but not exactly in line with the change in profits.1 This is particularly relevant in cyclical industries, where a progressive dividend implies a changing payout ratio over the cycle.

Back to Table of contents

Further reading

Books:

  • Bender, Ruth, and Keith Ward. Corporate Financial Strategy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2009.
  • Ross, Stephen A., Randolph W. Westerfield, and Bradford D. Jordan. Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2008.

Website:

Back to top

Share this page

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Bookmark and Share